Mobile TV

Amitabh Kumar
Home
Book Contents
New Developments
About the Author
Media Coverage
Mobile WiMAX Updates
Contact Us
Website Reviews
Regulatory Developments
Mobile TV Viewership Data
International Fora
Mobile TV Standards Updat
CMMB China
Blog
3D Mobile TV
Regulatory developments
 

All Set for WiMAX Frequency Auctions in India on Jan 16, 2009

Nov 26,2008

 

Major broadband operators who have been trying to make the best of WiMAX technology may now have reason to cheer as the DOT plans to auction the prime WiMAX spectrum in the 2.5 GHz band. This auction, which forms a part of the pre-announced plan for the auction of 3G and WiMAX spectrum is being considered very important by the potential bidders owing to many reasons.

First, the 2.5 GHz band is ideally suited for Mobile WiMAX and WiMAX Forum approved profiles and devices certified for the profiles are readily available. The Mobile WiMAX is a generation ahead of the Fixed WiMAX which the Indian operators have been trying to deploy for enterprise applications.

            However it is only Mobile WiMAX which brings with it the possibility of use by numerous mobile devices with guaranteed QoS. The Mobile WiMAX standards provide for sub-channeling in both uplink and downlink directions and make possible very low frequency resources to be allocated to each device thereby reducing power consumption and making possible the simultaneous operation of  a large number of devices in the coverage area.

The Indian regulations price the WiMAX spectrum  very attractively with all India Spectrum base price being only $200 million and a 1% spectrum charge. being able to use it for both voice and broadband services pits it squarely against 3G technologies. The IMT 2000 has already accepted OFDMA-TDD as one of the access technologies under the 3GPP and it is possible to use Mobile WIMAX much like 3G technologies for launch of mobile voice services. It can easily be adapted to the 3GPP architecture using IP Multimedia System ( IMS ) which remains the most popular technology for integration of broadband and mobile networks.

Over a period of time Mobile WiMAX is expected to see a slew of new devices ranging from Mobile handsets to media players which work natively on Mobile WiMAX networks. The launch of the XOHM network in USA has already become a powerhouse of new devices based on Mobile WiMAX ranging from Nokia Internet tablet to Phones such as LG 4G MAX. And yet, this is only the beginning.

 

The process of auctions will begin on Dec 8th with the issue of Information Memorandum.

 

Indian Policies now recognize Mobile WiMAX as an alternative technology to 3G

 

Sept 12,2008

The newly announced changes to the 3G auction Policy and the WiMAX spectrum auctions now contains elements of recognition that WiMAX is not simply a way to extend wireless but an entirely viable and complete technology in itself. The recognition of the importance of WiMAX to be able to operate as an independent network providing voice, video and data services came in the form of doubling of the minimum reserve price for WiMAX auctions from Rs. 50.5 Billion ( $1.2Billion) to Rs 100.10 Billion ( $2.4 Billion).

 

Considering the runaway growth of mobile subscribers at over 10 million a month and the consequent shortage of spectrum has led to a wake up call to the government. The 3G, which at one stage was being intended to be given away to existing players at throwaway prices will now be auctioned  to all players including foreign bidders, thus breaking a cozy club which had kept the prices artificially high for roaming and any form of value added services.

The government and the regulator have also recognized the value of the WiMAX spectrum in the prime mobile WiMAX bands of 2.1, 2.3 and 2.5 GHz bands which is slated for auction in the near future. The new revised price is a reflection of the recognition of these bands for providing a range of mobile WiMAX based services including VoIP, broadband internet and video. It may be recalled that earlier in Aug 2008, the regulator had already recommended opening up of VoIP services, previously limited to only fixed line or mobile service licenses to ISPs as well. WiMAX, then had become a natural candidate for the ISPs to potentially provide all services including Mobile Voice using the WiMAX technologies. The new spectrum policy also opens up the 700 MHz band for WiMAX auctions, denying the plea of industry players  to keep this  band reserved for Terrestrial Digital TV. However, once auctioned the new WiMAX players are more than likely to use this band for WiMAX TV services. With capabilities of indoor reception and long cell sizes the band is ideally suited for WiMAX TV.

 

WiMAX bands of 2.3 and 2.5 GHz are the ones where certified WiMAX devices are already available or will be available by end of the year making these the prime bands for inexpensive deployment of mobile WiMAX networks with ready availability of user devices.

 

The importance of Mobile WiMAX spectrum and in particular the 2.5 GHz band has increased after the WRC’07 had adopted OFDMA-TDD as one of the approved air interfaces under the IMT2000 implying that the band can be used under the 3GPP architectures. However the initial deployments are likely to use WiMAX networks along with the IP Multimedia system (IMS) as defined under the 3GPP.

 

While the reserve prices are still a reasonable $2.4 Billion for the whole country, it is expected that the auction process will lead to a price discovery which is at least double of these prices, probably more. This also impacts the state run companies BSNL and MTNL as they need to pay for spectrum at the same rates as the highest bids received. This is likely to impact their cash flows in the absence of sale of equity unlike the private players.  It also has the potential to bring new aggressive players who have started their life as ISPs to enter the lucrative mobile services market.

                                               WiMAX Home

 

Stage Set for Mobile Multimedia Services in India as 3G and MVNO Policies Announced


7 Aug 2008
The announcement by the Govt. of India of the auction of 3G spectrum auction coupled with the announcement of policy for mobile virtual network operators marks the beginning of a new era in the fastest growing telecom market in the world.

The 3G spectrum auction policy has been talked about for the last 3 years and has now finally been announced. This policy ( http://www.dot.gov.in/2008/aug%202008/spectrum_2.pdf) envisages a multistage bidding process for spectrum blocks of 5x2 MHz as paired bands in the 1.9/2.1 GHz bands. A total of 5 to 10 such slots are slated to be
auctioned. Spectrum will also be auctioned in the 1900 MHz band for EVDO services providing an upgrade path for the CDMA operators.
The bidding is open to all investors irrespective of whether they hold the 2G licenses or not. This is expected to bring in additional operators who missed the action earlier

However the change of greater significance will be ushered in by the Mobile Virtual Network Operator policy, whereby innovative service provides can buy the resources such as infrastructure or airtime and provide their own offerings of mobile multimedia.
This relieves the mobile operators to meet the network and user growth requirements while it permits a number of new operators to try their own business models for mobile multimedia, Mobile TV, streaming of video and audio and other services based on mobile multimedia such as music stores.
 
India to Set 3G and Mobile WiMAX Spectrum allocation rules

May 27,2008
The Indian telecommunications minister Mr. A Raja has gone on record ( 23rd May ) to state that the Policies and guidelines for the allocation of 3G Spectrum will be issued by June 2008.

This is quite ambitious, considering that the submission of comments to the Indian regulator TRAI on the allocation of 3G and WiMAX spectrum has closed on 23rd May 2008. The process of review and public consultation could take the best part of June 2008. Thereafter the DoT and the other agencies need to decide on the modalities of its auction.

The Indian mobile operators lobby has been traditionally very strong ( not surprising considering that they have over the quarter of the population of India as their subscribers) in wresting concessions in their favour. As expected their chorus has been to consider only existing GSM operators for such allocation. However in this instance the telecommunications minister Mr Raja has been holding his fort strongly to permit even the foreign bidders in the process.

We have always maintained that the implementation of policies which have a long term bearing on the entire nation need to implemented with considerable care. It is not easy to undo such allocations and serious distortions in quality of services
and prices to customers can arise owing to faulty policies.

The TRAI has already sounded a note of caution on the question whether the mobile operators should also be allowed to accumulate the Mobille WiMAX spectrum and if so to what extent. It is well known that after the WRC 2007 , which made OFDMA-TDD ( one of the profiles of mobile WiMAX) a part of the IMT-advanced air interfaces the mobile operators have been spoiling for grabbing the mobile WiMAX Spectrum. However as things turn out in such cases, while the TRAI has recommended the grabbing of new spectrum by the existing mobile operators only, the minister Mr Rajah, true to his name, stands in the way like a King! If it spoils the party for some, so be it.

 
WRC 2007 decisions may adversely influence frequency allocations for Mobile WiMAX in India

There was general cheer in the WiMAX camp when the OFDMA-TDD was accepted as one of the approved air interfaces under the IMT-Advanced. Mobile WiMAX thus became one of the technologies using which 3G mobile services could be provided. It was considered an important development also because of the impact in Europe which had sharply divided bands for IMT-Advanced and WiMAX making it difficult for WiMAX operators access to the 2.5-2.69 GHz and 2.3-2.4 GHz bands.

However in India the decisions by the WRC and the ITU seem to be having just the opposite effect. With the ever powerful mobile operators lobby, which has already wrested a range of decisions in its favor, including barring any foreign companies from bidding for 3G spectrum, it has now embarked on a new ruse.
This is to wrest the allocation of the Mobile WiMAX spectrum in the 2.3-2.4 and 2.5-2.69 GHz bands in its favour citing the WRC decisions of commanality of air interfaces. The mobile operators are contending that as the WRC has accepted WiMAX-TDD as a part of IMT advanced, it is an enabling factor for the DoT to allocate to them the mobile WiMAX spectrum in these bands, which they would be able to use for their 3 G services. If WiMAX goes into the background owing to it, so be it.

The Consultation paper on the allocation of these spectrum bands closed on May 23, 2008. Without waiting for the recommendations of the regulator, the DoT has started calling a meeting of mobile operators who are keen to grab the booty. The recommendations of the regulator, when issued can always be filed. Of course with all the respect and the dignity they deserve.

 

Pipeline Wireless USA gets FCC Nod to rollout Nationwide WiMAX network in the 3.65-3.7 GHz Band

The new frequency band of 3650-3700 MHz has been shrouded in controversy since the last two years, when the reports of WiMAX interfering with the satellite C-Band communications (3700-4200 MHz) and the lower extended C-band communications ( 3400-3700 MHz) had come begun to come in. In fact the interference was reported even though the WiMAX systems under observation were those in the 3400 MHz range. In fact the WRC held in Nov 2007 has also come to the conclusion that WiMAX systems as far as 10 Km away can severely interfere with a satellite receiving station.

Now with the WiMAX being allowed bang next to the C-band, the FCC has embarked on a new frontier. As per FCC regulations for the use of this band, contention based systems (including WiMAX) are explicitly allowed to be used in this band. Also the power which is permitted is quite high i.e. 25 watts EIRP for a base station with 25 MHz bandwidth. All base stations however are required to be registered.
This may put a question on unhindered use of C-band communications in the US in the next 2-3 years as the systems roll out. At present the WiMAX Forum has no profiles for certification in this band for mobile WiMAX, and this may take a while to be in place. The CPEs and base stations will also be available for this frequency band once the investments in the networks begin.
Many countries in Asia have put on hold even the licensing of systems in the 3.5-3.6 GHz range due to interference issues. The new policy of FCC to permit WiMAX in all available bands will open up a new policy debate on the use of C-Band in many countries. C-Band satellite systems have a planning cycle of 3 years and a life of 15+ years. This implies that new systems can impact the deliverable services anytime during the life of a satellite putting a question mark on the valuation of many satellite companies.
Already interference from WiMAX systems has been reported from Australia, New Zealand, Russia and Hongkong amongst others.
The auction of the 700 MHz band made free as a result of the digital dividend by the FCC( which incidentally raised over $19 billion for the three blocks) is also no less controversial in terms of end usage. While the WiMAX Forum had announced the adaptation of future certification profiles in the 700 MHz band in order to be ready to enable systems when companies winning the auction were getting ready to deploy these systems, the news of AT&T and Verizon winning the major blocks and AT&T planning to use these for LTE has left many questions open before policy watchers in other countries. One of the reasons cited for the profiles in the 700 MHz band was that these have much lower losses and are suited for in-building use. However the same argument goes against the use of 3.65 GHz for mobile WiMAX.
Are we really, on a worldwide basis getting ready for technology neutral use of these bands? Are WRC observations, which have been considered sacrosanct so far are to be interpreted as national requirements? We will need to seek an answer to these questions, as at present we do not find any.

 
Indian regulator TRAI Announces Mobile TV Licensing Recommendations for India( Jan 23, 2008)

The Indian regulator for the broadcasting and telecommunications sectors has issued recommendations for licensing of Mobile TV services in India. This completes the process of consultation on the Mobile TV and places the onus of announcing the License Policy on the ministry of information and broadcasting ( MIB).

The licensing regulations primarily address the terrestrial broadcast mode for mobile TV. No recommendations have been made for the satellite mode of mobile TV services delivery, which incidentally had found a prominent place in its draft recommendations issued on 3rd Jan 2008. It has also left the mobile TV on cellular networks ( GSM, CDMA or 3G networks) to be governed by the operators mobile telephony( CMTS) or universal services licenses( UASL).

The salient features of the Mobile TV policy recommendations are as follows:
- Technology Neutrality (i.e. DVB-H, DMB or FLO technologies have been permitted along with others).
- 74% FDI permitted, but no broadcasting or Cable TV company can hold more than 20% in a mobile TV company. Likewise a mobile TV company can not hold more than 20% in a broadcasting or Cable TV company
- Licenses to be issued for each “Circle” or for the entire country based on a bidding process for licenses.
- Each licensee to be issued Spectrum of 8 MHz in UHF band V(585-806 MHz), only one license( or one spectrum slot) to be permitted to any one company
- 4% of gross revenues or 5% of the highest license bid; whichever is higher; to be paid as revenue share every year
-Net Worth requirements of $0.75 Million ( Appox.) per service area. This translates to about $15 million for the country.
-Services to commence within 18 months; enforced by a performance bank guarantee of $0.5 million for each service area ( $11 million for the country).
- Content to be regulated by the content code of the MIB

Comments on the recommendations

-The mobile TV licensing recommendations as issued are quite onerous in terms of the license fees and ongoing revenue shares. The performance bank guarantees are also very high.
-Linking of annual revenue share to 5% of the highest bid for an area seems to lack any logic as a rouge bid would imply all operators needing to pay a very high license fees.
- By placing equity cross holding restrictions on broadcasting companies, it virtually prohibits such operators to extend their services to the mobile screen- a natural extension.
This means that different companies need to be formed for each screen size or mode of delivery.
- The mobile TV services, per se, have not been defined. Does mobile TV mean delivery to mobile devices or does it mean to those with a specific screen size such as QCIF or QVGA or is it by basing it on terrestrial broadcast.

- The recommendations are silent on the relationship pf mobile TV with standard definition terrestrial TV (such as DVB-T). In most implementations DVB-H services can be delivered on the same carrier as that used for DVB-T. The same is the case in ISDB-T technology used in Japan. In the recommendations now issued, such operation has been ruled out.
- The recommendations make no reference to other delivery extensions such as WiMAX, another mode of delivery of mobile TV Technologies.
- Interchangeability of handsets has been prescribed between different service provides ( if the handsets are provided by them). This is tricky with various versions of the same technology much less between different technologies. An example is the DVB-H technologies based on OMA-BCAST or DVB-CMBS implementations.
- The recommendations are silent on audio services to be provided on the same media. At present the FM, to which parallels have been drawn throughout, does not permit news and current affairs.
- No requirements are placed on mobile operators to give a reference interconnect offer for the return path, which may be critical in many implementations. The mobile operators providing services on their own networks have a conflict of interest with the broadcasters providing services via a terrestrial medium- the subject of current licensing policy.
- All mobile TV licensees are required to share their infrastructure with other mobile TV licensees. This can lead to a wait and watch game in the 18 months leading to the launch of services to piggyback on the operator which launches services first, though it is expected that Doordarshan infrastructure may initially be used by all licensees. This can have serious implications if a company setting up infrastructure can not derive a competitive advantage from the same. The cellular operators however have been kept beyond the purview of such compulsory sharing.
- The FDI of 74% is inconsistent with the current licensing policy in the media sector where 49% is the norm.

On the whole it appears that the ministry of information and broadcasting which sought the recommendations in the first place may have a hard task to maintain a semblance of uniformity of treatment to broadcasters as against cellular operators for providing the same service.